Knowledge baseStrategies

Market Making: two-sided quotes

Quotes a bid and an ask around the mid price and earns the round trip when price comes back through them. For pairs that swing wider than the fee floor.

4 min read

Anton Shchur· Founder· Updated August 12, 2026

What Market Making is

Market Making continuously quotes both a buy (bid) and a sell (ask) order around the mid price, a set distance apart, and closes a round trip when price comes back through both. Inventory builds organically as one side fills more than the other.

Market making: a bid below and an ask above the mid — a round trip closes when price travels back through both

What it is NOT

A professional market maker stands at the touch — its quotes are the best in the book — and lives on a maker rebate. On the fee rates available to you that game does not exist: a round trip costs roughly 20 basis points in fees, while the entire bid/ask spread of a liquid pair is a fraction of one. Our own fee floor admits it and pushes the quote far outside the touch — on ETH some 750× further from mid than the best order in the book.

So the quote is not providing liquidity at the touch. It fills when price travels to it, which makes this a strategy that earns on oscillation and loses on trend.

Key parameters

  • •Spread (half-spread, per side) — how far the quotes sit from mid. It must clear maker fee + 0.05%, or the engine pauses the system, and realistically 0.25% or more to also cover inventory drift. Wider = more per round trip, fewer fills.
  • •Order size / re-quote interval — how much you quote and how often you re-center as the mid moves.
  • •Inventory cap — the ceiling on how much of the asset the system may accumulate.

When to use it

  • •Spot pairs whose swing is wider than the fee floor. Pick by amplitude, not by book depth.
  • •Sideways regimes, where price keeps coming back through your quotes.

When NOT to use it

  • •Trending markets — only one side fills and inventory piles up against you.
  • •Ultra-tight, ultra-liquid books: the quote stands far from the market and rarely fills at all.

The pitfall

Inventory risk — and it is the main cost, not fees. Measured across every market-making system on the platform, drift on held inventory cost about twice what commissions did. In a trend you keep filling one side and the mark-to-market loss on that growing position dwarfs the round-trip income: on a trending pair a system lost 78.8 b.p. of turnover, while on a volatile, oscillating one another earned 22.3. Cap inventory, respect the spread floor, and stay out of trending regimes.

Reading is free. So is testing.

Paper trading costs nothing and needs no card. Build a system, backtest it on real candles, and decide from the result.